This progress report for G20 Leaders set out details about the implementation of the FSB’s workplan to reduce misconduct. Following significant and widespread incidents of misconduct in recent years, and given the potential of misconduct to harm institutions and customers and impair trust in the financial system, in May 2015 the FSB agreed a work plan to reduce misconduct risks.

This report details the recent actions taken and recommended by the FSB and the standard-setting bodies under the following headings:

Since the publication of the FSB’s last progress report in September, the FSB and the standard-setting bodies have taken the following action:

Measures to strengthen financial institution governance:

In May, the FSB published a stocktake on efforts to strengthen governance frameworks to reduce misconduct risk. The report set out areas where follow-up-work is underway with a view to developing a toolkit for supervisors to mitigate misconduct risk. These areas include: (i) responsibility mapping to strengthen governance of misconduct risks in financial institutions; (ii) addressing information gaps and due diligence in employment within the financial sector of individuals with a history of misconduct; and (iii) the use of governance mechanisms to address cultural risk factors that drive misconduct.

In June, the FSB issued for consultation supplementary guidance on the use of compensation tools to address misconduct. The proposed guidance provides firms and supervisors with a framework to consider how compensation practices and tools, such as in-year bonus adjustments, malus and clawback, can be used to reduce misconduct risk and address misconduct incidents.

Actions directed at authorities’ capacity to address misconduct risk

In June, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report setting out how market regulators can discourage, identify, prevent and sanction misconduct in wholesale markets, including the managers who are responsible for supervising professionals in these markets. The IOSCO report identifies tools relevant to minimising misconduct risk that may arise from the characteristics of wholesale markets, including market structure, opacity, conflicts of interest with market makers, size and organizational complexity of market participants, individual accountability in the firm context, and increasing automation.

Actions directed at improving market structures and practices

Good progress has been made in strengthening some major interest rate benchmarks (IBORs) setting processes and reducing manipulation risks, in line with IOSCO’s Principles for Financial Benchmarks. Three currency areas (Japan, UK and US) have also now selected alternative near-risk free rates (RFR), and work is underway to develop recommendations for an effective transition plan to RFRs, where appropriate, both in derivatives markets and funding markets more broadly. The FSB and IOSCO will report to G20 Finance Ministers and Governors on progress in this area, including on matters for users of financial benchmarks to consider when selecting benchmarks and for contingency planning.

In May, a global code of conduct for wholesale foreign exchange markets was published by the FX Working Group of the BIS Markets Committee, establishing a common set of guidelines for good practice in support of a robust, fair, liquid, open, and appropriately transparent global FX marketplace. The Global FX code will serve as a supplement to any and all local laws, rules and regulations by identifying global good practices and processes. It contains 55 principles covering areas including ethics; governance; execution and client order handling; handling confidential information; risk management and compliance; and confirmation and settlement. A blueprint for achieving widespread adoption of the Code has also been published by the Market Participants Group.