Search
Sort by
Content Types
Policy Areas
File types
Published After
Published Before
Results 1 - 20 of 114
FSB recommends further strengthening of the framework for global systemically important banks in Switzerland
Peer review assesses Switzerland’s implementation of too-big-to-fail reforms for global systemically important banks and outlines recommendations to further strengthen its framework.
2016 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs)
30 banks identified as G-SIBs as part of the annual identification process of global systemically important financial institutions.
2023 List of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs)
List of G-SIBs reduced from 30 to 29.
2019 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs)
30 banks identified as G-SIBs through the annual identification process.
2020 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs)
Thirty banks identified as G-SIBs through the annual identification process.
2022 List of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs)
Thirty banks identified as G-SIBs through the annual identification process.
2021 List of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs)
Thirty banks identified as G-SIBs through the annual identification process.
2017 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs)
30 banks identified as G-SIBs through the annual identification process.
2018 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs)
29 banks identified as G-SIBs through the annual identification process.
2013 Update of Group of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs)
The FSB and the BCBS have updated the list of G-SIBs, using end-2012 data and an updated assessment methodology published by the BCBS in July 2013.
2015 update of list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs)
FSB and BCBS have updated the list of G-SIBs, using end-2014 data and the BCBS assessment methodology.
Peer Review of Switzerland
Peer review examines Switzerland’s implementation of too-big-to-fail reforms for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs).
Principles on Bail-in Execution
Principles to assist authorities operationalise resolution strategies for global systemically important banks.
FSB launches evaluation of too-big-to-fail reforms and invites feedback from stakeholders
Evaluation will assess whether the implemented reforms are reducing the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with systemically important banks.
FSB issues final Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity standard for global systemically important banks
The TLAC standard has been designed so that failing G-SIBs will have sufficient loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity available in resolution.
Adequacy of Loss-Absorbing Capacity of Global Systemically Important Banks in resolution
This consultative document seeks comments on policy proposals developed at the request of G20 leaders to enhance loss-absorbing capacity of G-SIBs in resolution. Comments welcomed by 2 February 2015.
FSB publishes final report of the evaluation of too-big-to-fail reforms for banks
FSB evaluation of the effects of too-big-to-fail reforms for banks finds some gaps still need to be addressed.
FSB statement on identification of global systemically important insurers
FSB, in consultation with the IAIS, has decided not to publish a new list of G-SIIs for 2017. Policy measures will continue to apply to the firms listed in the 2016 G-SII communication.
FSB releases guidance on resolution planning for systemically important insurers
FSB provides guidance on issues for authorities to consider in resolution planning for systemically important insurers.
FSB Announces Policy Measures to Address Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs) and Names Initial Group of Global SIFIs
FSB announces policy measures and implementation timelines for measures to address too-big-to-fail risks associated with systemically important financial institutions.
Page 1 of 6 Next